Springer.com | SpringerLink.com
Register | Log in
Home | About | For Libraries | Contact Us | Help
Show advanced options

Contents

  • Image
  • Caption
  • Extracts from this Article
  • Image Source Details
  • Images from this Article
  • Copyright Information

Keywords

 = user generated What's this?

This image provided by:

Image provided by Springer
 Cox regression models displaying 1-year post-infarction risk of cardiac event according to LV ejection fraction and total LV ischaemia. Diagonal lines, Lines of equal risk. Risk increases as total LV ischaemia increases and LV ejection fraction decreases. LV ejection fraction and scintigraphic results for each of 92 patients who did (solid circles) or did not (open circles) have subsequent cardiac events over the entire follow-up period are plotted against calculated risk at 1 year. (From reference [246])

Caption

Cox regression models displaying 1-year post-infarction risk of cardiac event according to LV ejection fraction and total LV ischaemia. Diagonal lines, Lines of equal risk. Risk increases as total LV ischaemia increases and LV ejection fraction decreases. LV ejection fraction and scintigraphic results for each of 92 patients who did (solid circles) or did not (open circles) have subsequent cardiac events over the entire follow-up period are plotted against calculated risk at 1 year. (From reference [246])

Extracts from the Article What's this?

ECG-gated imaging also provides a measure of left ventricular function, which has additional value in predicting outcome (Fig.  3 ) [ 246 ].

Image Source Details

Download Article Go to Source post to Citeulike

Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence

by  Underwood, S. R.;  Anagnostopoulos, C.;  Cerqueira, M.;  Ell, P. J.;  Flint, E. J.;  Harbinson, M.;  Kelion, A. D.;  Al-Mohammad, A.;  Prvulovich, E. M.;  Shaw, L. J.;  Tweddel, A. C.
Journal: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging  Vol.  31  Issue  2
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1344-5
Published: 2004-02-01
Institution(s):  Royal Brompton Hospital,  Georgetown University Medical Center,  UCL, The Middlesex Hospital,  Wordsley Hospital,  Antrim Area Hospital,  Harefield Hospital,  Northern General Hospital,  Atlanta Cardiovascular Research Institute,  Castle Hill Hospital


Abstract

This review summarises the evidence for the role of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. It is the product of a consensus conference organised by the British Cardiac Society, the British Nuclear Cardiology Society and the British Nuclear Medicine Society and is endorsed by the Royal College of Physicians of London and the Royal College of Radiologists. It was used to inform the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence in their appraisal of MPS in patients with chest pain and myocardial infarction. MPS is a well-established, non-invasive imaging technique with a large body of evidence to support its effectiveness in the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction. It is more accurate than the exercise ECG in detecting myocardial ischaemia and it is the single most powerful technique for predicting future coronary events. The high diagnostic accuracy of MPS allows reliable risk stratification and guides the selection of patients for further interventions, such as revascularisation. This in turn allows more appropriate utilisation of resources, with the potential for both improved clinical outcomes and greater cost-effectiveness. Evidence from modelling and observational studies supports the enhanced cost-effectiveness associated with MPS use. In patients presenting with stable or acute chest pain, strategies of investigation involving MPS are more cost-effective than those not using the technique. MPS also has particular advantages over alternative techniques in the management of a number of patient subgroups, including women, the elderly and those with diabetes, and its use will have a favourable impact on cost-effectiveness in these groups. MPS is already an integral part of many clinical guidelines for the investigation and management of angina and myocardial infarction. However, the technique is underutilised in the UK, as judged by the inappropriately long waiting times and by comparison with the numbers of revascularisations and coronary angiograms performed. Furthermore, MPS activity levels in this country fall far short of those in comparable European countries, with about half as many scans being undertaken per year. Currently, the number of MPS studies performed annually in the UK is 1,200/million population/year. We estimate the real need to be 4,000/million/year. The current average waiting time is 20 weeks and we recommend that clinically appropriate upper limits of waiting time are 6 weeks for routine studies and 1 week for urgent studies.

more …


Other Images from this Article

x

License

This image is copyrighted by Springer-Verlag.

This image is published with open access and made available for noncommercial purposes. For more information on what you are allowed to do with this image, please see the Creative Commons pages.

If you would like to obtain permissions for the re-use or re-print of this image, please click here.

Report a copyright concern regarding this image.

Log in or register to save your
favorite images and download
them as high-quality
PowerPoint or PDF files.

Log in or register to save your search criteria.



© Springer 2010. Produced by Current Medicine Group Ltd, a part of Springer Science+Business Media

Home | About | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | RSS | Help